首页> 外文OA文献 >Study addiction - a new area of psychological study: conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings
【2h】

Study addiction - a new area of psychological study: conceptualization, assessment, and preliminary empirical findings

机译:研究成瘾-心理研究的一个新领域:概念化,评估和初步经验结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: Recent research has suggested that for some individuals, educational studying may become compulsive and excessive and lead to ‘study addiction’. The present study conceptualized and assessed study addiction within the framework of workaholism, defining it as compulsive over-involvement in studying that interferes with functioning in other domains and that is detrimental for individuals and/or their environment. Methods: The Bergen Study Addiction Scale (BStAS) was tested - reflecting seven core addiction symptoms (salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, relapse, and problems) - related to studying. The scale was administered via a cross-sectional survey distributed to Norwegian (n = 218) and Polish (n = 993) students with additional questions concerning demographic variables, study-related variables, health, and personality. Results: A one-factor solution had acceptable fit with the data in both samples and the scale demonstrated good reliability. Scores on BStAS converged with scores on learning engagement. Study addiction (BStAS) was significantly related to specific aspects of studying (longer learning time, lower academic performance), personality traits (higher neuroticism and conscientiousness, lower extroversion), and negative health-related factors (impaired general health, decreased quality of life and sleep quality, higher perceived stress). Conclusions: It is concluded that BStAS has good psychometric properties, making it a promising tool in the assessment of study addiction. Study addiction is related in predictable ways to personality and health variables, as predicted from contemporary workaholism theory and research.
机译:目的:最近的研究表明,对于某些人来说,教育学习可能会变得强迫性和过度,并导致“学习成瘾”。本研究在工作狂的框架内对研究成瘾进行了概念化和评估,将其定义为强迫性地过度参与研究,从而干扰了其他领域的功能,并且对个人和/或他们的环境有害。方法:对卑尔根研究成瘾量表(BStAS)进行测试,以反映与学习有关的七个核心成瘾症状(显着性,情绪改变,宽容,戒断,冲突,复发和问题)。该量表是通过向挪威(n = 218)和波兰(n = 993)学生分发的横断面调查进行管理的,其中还涉及有关人口统计学变量,与研究相关的变量,健康状况和个性的其他问题。结果:单因素解决方案与两个样本中的数据都可以接受,并且量表显示出良好的可靠性。 BStAS的分数与学习参与度的分数收敛。学习成瘾(BStAS)与学习的特定方面(更长的学习时间,学习成绩较低),人格特质(较高的神经质和自觉性,外向性较低)和负面健康相关因素(一般健康状况受损,生活质量下降)显着相关和睡眠质量,更高的感知压力)。结论:结论是,BStAS具有良好的心理测量特性,使其成为评估研究成瘾性的有前途的工具。研究成瘾以可预测的方式与人格和健康变量相关联,正如当代工作狂理论和研究所预测的那样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号